From my observations of the electromagnetic force, I am now lead to consider that some of the energy that we currently believe is the pull of Gravitational force, is instead coming from Electromagnetic force and most people have misunderstood to what extent each of these two forces is acting upon the mass in question.
The result of these observations is that if a strong enough electromagnetic vortex of 'like polarisation' is introduced to an object, then it is able to overcome the pull of gravity and so become charged with a force of anti-gravity; as 'like poles' repel each other.
Electric space, plasma universe, escape velocity, Nikola Tesla, fusion power, Viktor Grebennikov, Levitation, UFOs, gravity control propulsion research, Hutchison effect.
The main reason for writing this paper is in reply to questions asked of me on a YouTube post. I thought that this information was more common knowledge, yet perhaps it isn't, so I will explain my point of view.
Months ago I found this video talking about the solar system as a Vortex and so I post a link to some of my friends, telling them how good a video by +DjSadha was. Them my friends said, no this video is not good, it's all wrong, yet I thought to myself that it seemed okay to me. So I went back to the video again and started reading the comments and found all these people saying how terrible the video was. So I wrote a few comments myself saying I thought it was okay, not perfect yet it did mention that the Sun was a vortex and that this was a new scientific idea that I liked. Then a few people started telling me I was totally wrong and I wrote back to them and here I am months later.
So what is my evidence to prove my point?
Before I get to that, let me first add a table explaining some scientific terms that seemed to have become mixed up by people discussing this subject on the YouTube / Google+ comments section.
Here are the real facts of what a fact is. FACT – That which exists, something witnessed firsthand, a datum of experience (plural: data).
HYPOTHESIS – A tentative scientific explanation for a set of observed facts, subject to future proof (or disproof) through further observation / experimentation. The usual progression is that a hypothesis graduates to being a theory.
THEORY – A framework of scientific explanation concerning a certain phenomenon or group of phenomena, which has gained validity by showing predictive power or explaining newly observed facts.
SCIENTIFIC LAW – A regular pattern of occurrence of natural events, so regular and predictable that there are few or no exceptions. The fewer the exceptions to a law, the better established it is.
An Electromagnetic vortex being the main force that holds the planets in place around the sun, may be just a theory, yet so is the theory of Gravity. What is my proof?
My evidence is proven by the following examples.
One item of proof is the UFO or Flying Saucer; for if they are real so is this theory on the subject of anti-gravity because these craft are held in the sky by an electromagnetic vortex and not by conventional means such as rocket propulsion. At some point, each one of us has seen a video of a UFO sighting, seen how the craft can accelerate faster than any jet plane or rocket, and we have seen how they turn a 90 degree turn at high speed; which according to our present understanding of newton's law of motion, would instantly crush any animals within the craft because of the massive g-force.
Another piece of proof is this video of anti-gravity in action. The work of John Hutchison, he does not totally know how it works; anyway it is called the 'Hutchison Effect'.
Another piece of evidence is to watch this video of Viktor Grebennikov - Anti-Gravity & Levitation. A magnetic vortex is used by nature and Man has yet to tap its full potential. This man has found a beetle which has wings that contain true anti-gravity properties; indeed this could be reconstructed by nanotechnology in the not-to-distance future.
How are these effect made possible? What is the science behind this evidence?
It is the effect of certain magnetic fields strong enough to counteract gravity. Below is some information explaining the massive power of the Plasma or Electric universe that we live in.
A paper produce at Harvard in 1996 – Electric space: Evolution of the plasma universe
Contrary to popular and scientific opinion of just a few decades ago, space is not an ‘empty’ void. It is actually filled with high energy particles, magnetic fields, and highly conducting plasma. The ability of plasmas to produce electric fields, either by instabilities brought about by plasma motion or the movement of magnetic fields, has popularized the term ‘Electric Space’ in recognition of the electric fields systematically discovered and measured in the solar system. Today it is recognized that 99.999% of all observable matter in the universe is in the plasma state and the importance of electromagnetic forces on cosmic plasma cannot be overstated; even in neutral hydrogen regions (˜10-4 parts ionized), the electromagnetic force to gravitational force ratio is 107. An early prediction about the morphology of the universe is that it be filamentary (Alfvén, 1950). Plasmas in electric space are energetic (because of electric fields) and they are generally inhomogeneous with constituent parts in motion. Plasmas in relative motion are coupled by the currents they drive in each other and nonequilibrium plasma often consists of current-conducting filaments. This paper explores the dynamical and radiative consequences of the evolution of galactic-dimensioned filaments in electric space.
I will explain why the theory of Gravity may not be all that it seems to be. When we talk of Gravity, many people do so in a general sense and state that whenever two objects are attracted towards each other, this attraction is the force of Gravity, yet a better term for that is the 'unification of forces' and there are three other forces besides Gravitational force, there is the Weak nuclear force, the Strong nuclear force and the Electromagnetic force.
These two websites below explain in detail just how strong this Electromagnetic force can be.
In 1977 I read Stan Deyo’s ‘The Cosmic Conspiracy’ and the ideas of how anti-gravity may work, this inspired me to look for answers. Also in Stan Deyo's book are details of how an anti-gravity craft may be constructed, as he claims to have been in one. And it does seem possible that the US government has these craft and does not want to talk about it.
I now go back to the first know scientific experiment on anti-gravity that I know of, that was The Biefeld-Brown Effect - This created a high voltage parallel plate capacitor with one or more layers. Brown’s British patent #300,111 – issued in 1927 – described what he termed a “cellular gravitator” consisting of numerous metal plates interleaved with dielectric plates, the entire block wrapped in insulating material and end plates connected to output electrodes and a spark gap to limit the input voltage. Brown talked about this after 1930.
As several other people have done work on anti-gravity and then gone silent, one must wonder if there is a cover-up. Could it be that great progress has been made in electro-magnetic gravity devices that the majority of the world’s population have been prevented from learning about, for some reason?
Conspiracies aside, it seems likely that a simple device that can create a magnetic field that is repelled by the Earth’s magnetic field will some be created with simple electronics of the 21st century. I mean, created by someone not working for a major government. The science of anti-gravity is constantly being drowned out by people claiming it is impossible, yet how long can they suppress it or deny it?
Research done on the subject is huge, here is some of what the US govt. as done. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research
If some people may still consider what is written above to be unlikely, some may say gravity is not working in parallel with electro-magnetic energy at all, that electro-magnetic energy is a neutral partner and gravity is the only factor that needs to be calculated; then they need to consider certain know laws of science.
The electromagnetic force manifests itself through the forces between charges (Coulomb's Law) and the magnetic force, both of which are summarized in the Lorentz force law. Fundamentally, both magnetic and electric forces are manifestations of an exchange force involving the exchange of photons . The quantum approach to the electromagnetic force is called quantum electrodynamics or QED. The electromagnetic force is a force of infinite range which obeys the inverse square law, and is of the same form as the gravity force.
If the effects of gravity were able to be observed while the subject matter was not within any type of electromagnetic field, only then would we see that the forces of gravity are much weaker, and we would know its 'true' effect on the ‘Escape velocity’ for example. Yet as the whole universe is a mesh of electromagnetic fields we are unable to see the influence it has on gravity and visa-versa, so many people assume it has very little, or that as the charge may be neutral it somehow has no power over gravity, yet just as a magnet has a field even if it has no electric boost, so does every object containing atoms have a magnet field of some type.
I find that the 'escape velocity' of a rocket is not based on gravity alone, as the rocket is also effected by the earth's vortex as well and this has always been part of the equation, and if some type of anti-gravity device was placed upon the rocket, it would change the 'escape velocity'.
What this means for our future, is that the cost of sending space craft into orbit could be reduced and mankind could progress at a faster pace.
Yet what is holding us back? Is some group or groups stopping mankind from advancing?
Why would anyone want to do that?
a/ Perhaps to stay in control of mankind?
b/ Live a better life while the rest of Mankind just struggle to survive?
c/ Hope that Mankind will fade away, so that others may be able to collect the minerals of this world, which may be of limited supply in the universe.
Yet I believe the science of anti-gravity explained here, has a place in our future and we have the freewill to use it for the good of Mankind, perhaps just as Tesla did with the electric AC motor and radio.
A high powered electromagnetic field can be created inside a small disc shaped craft with a nuclear reactor much like that one's used in today's atomic submarines. Telsa had an idea for a Plasma energy core, which is produces much more energy than even nuclear does.
Telsa’s original idea allows us to focus high temperature in the use of plasma energy to 100 times the heat of the sun without heating the outer surface. Information is at 34 minutes into this YouTube video.
I would like to thank all the people who I have referenced in this paper and hope that I have not said anything about them that they disagree with.
The Gravitational attraction of an object can be altered by the strength of the Electromagnetic field acting upon it.